Sustainability Solutions | Anitech

ASIC Greenwashing Enforcement: What Australian Businesses Must Know

ASIC Greenwashing Enforcement: What Australian Businesses Must Know

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is increasingly active in addressing greenwashing—making misleading or unsubstantiated ESG claims. Organisations making ESG and sustainability claims must ensure statements are accurate, substantiated, and comply with Australian Consumer Law. This guide explains ASIC’s enforcement approach and how to avoid greenwashing risks.

For comprehensive ESG strategy context, see our complete ESG guide for Australian businesses.

What Is Greenwashing?

Definition

Greenwashing refers to making misleading environmental, social, or governance claims that overstate an organisation’s actual ESG performance or commitments. Common forms include:

  • Claiming “net zero” or “carbon neutral” without clear definition or credible pathway
  • Using vague terms like “sustainable” or “eco-friendly” without substantiation
  • Highlighting minor ESG initiatives while downplaying material negative impacts
  • Setting aspirational targets without interim milestones or realistic achievability assessment
  • Using environmental imagery or language to imply environmental commitment beyond actual operations
  • Misrepresenting product environmental attributes without scientific support
  • Claiming third-party endorsements (certifications, awards) not actually held

ASIC’s Enforcement Authority and Approach

ASIC’s Role

ASIC is Australia’s corporate regulator with authority to enforce against misleading or deceptive conduct in financial and corporate matters, including ESG claims affecting investors and market integrity.

ASIC’s enforcement priorities include:

  • Misleading ESG and climate claims affecting investors
  • Inaccurate or unsupported sustainability disclosures in annual reports or marketing materials
  • False or misleading product sustainability claims (particularly for financial products)
  • Breach of continuous disclosure obligations by not disclosing material ESG risks

ASIC RG 228: Regulatory Guidance

ASIC issued Regulatory Guide 228 (RG 228) in November 2023 providing guidance on managing conflicts of interest in relation to ESG advice and labelling. Key points:

  • Financial services firms must have adequate systems and processes to manage conflicts in ESG products and advice
  • Product disclosure must clearly explain ESG credentials and limitations
  • Fund managers using ESG labels must ensure products meet the stated ESG objectives
  • Marketing materials must be accurate and substantiated

Enforcement Actions

ASIC has taken enforcement action against organisations making misleading ESG claims, including:

  • Infringement notices: For breaches of financial services laws, resulting in fines of $100,000+ for significant misstatements
  • Banning orders: Prohibiting individuals from managing financial services businesses where greenwashing was systematic
  • Remediation orders: Requiring organisations to correct misleading disclosures and compensate affected investors

Substantiating ESG and Sustainability Claims

Key Principles for Compliant Claims

1. Truthfulness and Accuracy

  • Claims must be accurate and not misleading
  • Use of data, metrics, and statements must be correct and not overstated
  • If claims are based on unaudited or estimated data, disclose this limitation

2. Substantiation

  • Claims must be substantiated by evidence (calculation, testing, external verification, expert opinion)
  • The evidence must be held before claims are made, not sourced afterward
  • Evidence must be relevant and sufficient to support the claim

3. Clarity and Completeness

  • Claims must not be misleading by omission of material information
  • Qualifications, limitations, or material assumptions must be disclosed
  • Avoid vague terminology (“sustainable,” “eco-friendly”) without clear definition

4. No Comparative Claims Without Support

  • Claiming “greener than competitors” requires evidence of comparative environmental benefit
  • Comparative claims must fairly represent competitor claims or practices

Substantiation Framework

For material ESG claims, follow this process:

  1. Define the claim clearly: What exactly are you claiming? (“Carbon neutral,” “Zero waste,” “Climate leader”)
  2. Identify evidence needed: What proof is required to substantiate? (calculation, certification, audit, expert opinion)
  3. Gather and review evidence: Obtain all supporting documentation before making the claim
  4. Document the evidence: Keep detailed records of data, calculations, assumptions, methodologies
  5. Make the claim: Disclose claim with appropriate qualifications and references to supporting evidence
  6. Maintain and update: Continuously monitor that claim remains accurate; update if circumstances change

High-Risk ESG Claims

Net-Zero Claims

ASIC views net-zero claims with significant scrutiny. Common issues:

  • Lack of interim targets: Claiming 2050 net-zero without clear milestones (e.g., 2030 targets) is high-risk
  • Reliance on offsets without reduction: Relying entirely on future offsets for net-zero is not credible without concrete emissions reduction actions
  • Unachievable pathways: Net-zero commitment without realistic business model transition is misleading
  • Scope 3 exclusions: Claiming net-zero for Scope 1 & 2 only without addressing material Scope 3 is potentially misleading

Best practice for net-zero claims: Define clearly (Scope 1, 2, 3), include interim targets (e.g., 50% by 2030), explain transition strategy, disclose assumptions and risks, use independent verification.

Renewable Energy Claims

Claims like “powered by renewable energy” or “100% renewable” require clear substantiation:

  • Renewable energy certificates (RECs) must match renewable energy claim
  • If claiming renewable energy, must have contracts or PPAs for the amount claimed
  • Disclosure should specify percentage of operations powered by renewables (not just targets)

ESG Fund Claims

For investment products with ESG labels:

  • Fund’s actual holdings must align with stated ESG objectives
  • Labels like “climate-conscious” or “ESG leader” must accurately describe the fund’s ESG criteria
  • Product disclosure must clearly explain ESG methodology and limitations
  • Fund managers must have systems to ensure holdings comply with stated ESG criteria

Avoiding Greenwashing Risk

1. Governance and Process

  • Assign responsibility for ESG claim review (typically legal/compliance team)
  • Establish approval process for marketing materials, reports, and public statements containing ESG claims
  • Document substantiation evidence for all material ESG claims before publication

2. Data and Metrics Integrity

  • Ensure ESG data and metrics are accurate, audited, or independently verified where claimed
  • Document calculation methodologies, assumptions, and data sources
  • Maintain audit trail for material ESG metrics

3. Disclosure Standards

  • Follow AASB S1 and S2 requirements for mandatory disclosures
  • Include appropriate qualifications and caveats (e.g., “estimates subject to ±10% uncertainty”)
  • Disclose material risks and limitations of claimed performance

4. External Verification

  • Consider external assurance for material ESG claims (required under AASB S1)
  • Use certification bodies or third parties for key claims where feasible
  • Distinguish between internally managed claims and externally verified claims

5. Stakeholder Communication

  • Balance positive achievements with honest disclosure of challenges and gaps
  • Avoid selective presentation of data that misrepresents overall ESG performance
  • Update disclosures when circumstances change (e.g., if target not achieved, explain why and revised commitment)

ASIC Enforcement Process

Investigation and Enforcement

If ASIC identifies potentially misleading ESG claims:

  • Inquiry: ASIC may contact the organisation requesting information about substantiation for claims
  • Assessment: ASIC reviews claim, substantiation, and applicable laws
  • Action: If breach identified, ASIC may issue infringement notice, seek undertakings (agreement to remedy), or refer for prosecution

Infringement Notices

ASIC can issue infringement notices for breaches of financial services laws or Australian Consumer Law, specifying:

  • Nature of breach
  • Financial penalty (typically $100,000–$500,000+ for significant breaches)
  • Required remedial actions (e.g., correcting disclosures, notifying affected parties)
  • Timeline for compliance

Frequently Asked Questions

Is ASIC only concerned with listed companies?

No. ASIC enforces consumer law against all organisations making misleading ESG claims affecting consumers or investors, whether listed or private.

What level of substantiation is sufficient for ESG claims?

Substantiation must match the claim. Minor claims (e.g., “reducing water use”) may need only internal measurement. Major claims (e.g., “net-zero by 2050”) require rigorous substantiation including pathway analysis, third-party verification, and clear target setting.

Can we use estimates or assumptions in ESG disclosures?

Yes, but must disclose that estimates are used and explain assumptions. Be clear about uncertainty or error ranges. Avoid estimates for claims requiring precision (e.g., exact emissions targets).

What if our ESG claim is not achieved?

Proactively disclose. Explain why target was missed, lessons learned, and revised commitment. Silence or misleading explanations is higher enforcement risk than honest acknowledgment.

Moving Forward: Greenwashing Compliance

ASIC’s increasing enforcement on greenwashing reflects global concern about misleading climate and sustainability claims. Organisations should take greenwashing risk seriously by implementing robust governance, substantiating claims, and disclosing limitations. Compliance with AASB S1/S2 standards, which require balanced, material disclosure of ESG information, is the strongest defence against greenwashing allegations.

Ready to review your ESG claims for compliance and substantiation? Book a Free ESG Strategy Session to assess your ESG disclosure and greenwashing risk.